Why Removing Government Involvement From The Police Hurts Black People


This is a story about Jeff Sessions, the top law enforcement official in the country.

Its also a story about key words used during theTrumpcampaign, and how those key words foreshadowed what Sessions is doing now.

Theres something you should know aboutthose key words, though. They can sound completely harmless to some people, butterrifying to others.

Asthe election season continued and Trump and his allies used these words more and more, black people definitely had reason to hear terror.

The news that came this week shows just what that reason is.

On Monday, it was reportedAttorney General Sessions ordered his staff to review the 20-plus agreements for reform that the Obama administration had signed with different police departments around the country.

These reform efforts were agreed upon in cities that saw the most fiery protests and high-profile shootings, like Baltimore, Ferguson, Cleveland and Chicago.

In practically every case, these agreements were the result of an investigation by the US Department of Justice. When the DOJ would release its findings, a familiar pattern would typically reveal itself: The police departments were no strangers to violating civil rights or disproportionately targeting black people.

Now that the DOJ is directed by Sessions, however, the department is threatening to alter the agreements. It is highly disappointing and concerning news, but also predictable.

Why? Because ofkey words like these:

1. States Rights

When it comes to matters relating tocriminal justice, Sessions has consistently talked about respectingstates rights.

In other words, he believes the federal government should not be meddling in local government affairs. On certain issues, states and cities should decide for themselves how to govern, Sessions says.

Thats one view, certainly. But heres another one: In American history, the idea of states rights has most notably been invokedby people in power who were avoiding policies that would fight segregation.


The argument against ending slavery? States rights.

The argument against ending segregation? States rights.

States rights, when referenced by politicians with regard to subjects that mostly concern black people, are seldoma good sign for black people.

So, when a Jeff Sessions deputy tried to delay the process for confirming Baltimores agreement with the Obama administration, its not a surprise what the deputy cited.

Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Gore said reform is really the job of local officials.

States rights.

2. Law And Order

The words law and order have history. Richard Nixon was the president of law of order when he got elected in 1968.

What followed was a drug war that resulted in a spike in arrests and demonization of users.

So, when Donald Trump went on the Republican National Convention stage last summer and did his best Nixon imitation,we knew what to watch for: an increase in arrests, more emphasis on the importance of police officers authorities and less emphasis on their accountability.


Sure enough, Jeff Sessions has begun to shift that balance of emphasis. He said back in February,

One of the big things out there thats, I think, causing trouble and where you see the greatest increase in violence and murders in cities is somehow, some way, we undermine the respect for our police and made, oftentimes, their job more difficult.

All the while, hes shown no evidence that indicates a link between respect for police and the levels of violent crime in different cities.

3. Tough On Crime

Trump has long suggested its time to get tougher on crime. While doing this, hes suggested increases in crime levels that have actually declined.

Take this speech at a Republican retreat, for example:

The fact that Trumps push to get tough on crime doesnt align with reality isnt exactly a surprise, though. Tough-on-crime politics have along been a cover for policies that just happen to result in jailing people of color for minor drug offenses.

So again, its not surprising the man Trump chose to lead the Department of Justice was Sessions, a politician committed to the idea of drug wars and mandatory sentences, neither of which has solved anything.

Sessions former colleague in the Senate, Republican senator Rand Paul, said it best.

In a 2013 op-ed for USA Today, Paul wrote,

Im against drug use. I think anyone who encourages its use is wrong and is doing damage to society.

But our current federal policies have done little to actually lessen drug use, while doing irreparable damage to even the most casual drug users young men and women whove made mistakes, just as a young Bush and Obama allegedly did.


None of that seems to matter, though.

It doesnt matter our drug wars have failed. It doesnt matter being tough on crime doesnt work. It doesnt matter instilling law and order is a proven dog whistle calling for oppressive policing.

It doesnt even matter states rights is a proven copout for the federal government to avoid fighting racism.

The reason it doesnt matter isbecause Jeff Sessions is starting to do things black people had plenty of reasons to fear when Trump got elected, regardless of what history says.

These actions arentunexpected, though. Therhetoric both men have used has made them predictable.

Read more:


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here