Two decades of talks have come to this: an ambitious agreement to hold the countries to emissions targets but already low-lying countries are worried
Governments have signalled an objective to the fossil fuel era, committing for the first time to a universal agreement to cut greenhouse gas emissions and to avoid the most dangerous effects of climate change.
After 20 years of fraught meetings, including the past two weeks spent in an exhibit dorm on the outskirts of Paris, negotiators from nearly 200 countries signed on to a legal agreement on Saturday evening that set ambitious goals to limit temperature rises and to hold governments to account for reaching those targets.
Government and business leaders said the agreement, which set a new goal to reach net zero emissions in the second half of the century, sent a powerful signal to global markets, hastening the transition away from fossil fuels and to a clean energy economy.
The deal was carefully constructed to carry legal force-out but without necessitating approving by the US Congress – which would have almost certainly rejected it.
After last-minute postpones, is a result of typos, mistranslations and disagreements over a single verb in the highly complicated legal text, Laurent Fabius, the French foreign minister, brought down a special leaf-shaped gavel to adopt the agreement. The dorm erupted in applause and cheers. It is a small gavel but I think it can do a great task, Fabius said.
FranASSois Hollande, the French president, who had invested enormous capital and diplomatic attempt in shepherding the agreement, said countries had a rare chance to make history. We are at a decisive point in time, he said.
Fabius said: It is my deep conviction that we have come up with an ambitious and balanced agreement. Today it is a moment of truth.
The agreement was equally a victory for the United Nations, which expended four years overcoming political inertia and the deep divisions between rich and poor countries, to put together the ambitious deal. I used to say: we must, we can, we will, Christiana Figueres, the UN climate chief who guided the talks, tweeted. Today we can say we did.
The US president, Barack Obama, hailed the agreement as a tribute to strong, principled American leadership and a vital step in ensuring the future of the planet.
This agreement represents the best chance we have to save the one planet that weve get, he said, but added that the deal was not perfect. The problems not solved because of this accord.
Miguel Arias CaA +- ete, the EUs climate commissioner, said the agreement had re-affirmed confidence in the UN process.
This was the last chance[ for the UN process ], he added, and we have taken it.
Al Gore, the former US vice-president who helped draft the 1997 Kyoto climate treaty, was in the dorm. He appeared visibly moved when the agreement was gavelled in and said the accord would have a powerful impact on the economy.
This universal and ambitious agreement sends a clear signal to governments, industries, and investors everywhere: the transformation of our global economy from one fuelled by dirty energy to one fuelled by sustainable economic growth is now firmly and inevitably underway, Gore said in a statement.
Six years after the chaotic ending of the Copenhagen climate summit, the agreement now known as the Paris Agreement for the first time perpetrates rich countries, rising economies and some of the poorest countries to work together to curb emissions.
Rich countries agreed to raise $100 bn( APS6 6bn) a year by 2020 to assist poor countries transform their economies. The overall agreement is legally binding, but some elements including the pledges to curb emissions by individual countries and the climate finance parts are not.
The deal was also hailed for delivering a clear message to business leaders. The International Investors Group on Climate Change, a network managing 13 tn of assets, said the decision would help trigger a transformation away from fossil fuels and promote greater investments in renewable energy.
Investors across Europe will now have the confidence to do much more to address the risks arising from high carbon assets and to seek possibilities linked to the low carbon transition already transforming the worlds energy system and infrastructure, different groups said.
Jennifer Morgan, of the environmental thinktank, the World Resources Institute, said the long term goal was transformational and sends signals into the heart of the markets.
The deal set a high aspirational goal to limit warming below 2C and strive to keep temperatures at 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels a far more ambitious target than expected, and a key demand of vulnerable countries.
It incorporates commitments from 187 countries to reduce emissions, which on their own was able to hold warming to between 2.7 C and 3C.
But it sets out procedures for review at regular intervals to deepen emissions cuts, with countries aiming to peak global greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible, and then rapidly scale down in the second half of this century.
Critics said the agreement would still denounce hundreds of million of people living in low-lying coastal areas and small islands, after US negotiators demanded the exclusion of speech that could allow the agreement to be used to claim legal liability for climate change. But advocates said the negotiations took a significant step forward in get countries to act together on a global challenge of immense complexity.
Saturdays agreement was the product of years of preparation, two weeks of intense negotiations, capped off by three sleepless nights, with Barack Obama and Hollande phoning other leaders to bring them on side with the deal.
Accounts from behind the closed doors of negotiating conference described tense exchanges between oil-producing countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Russia, and a rapidly constituted US- and Europe-backed High Ambition Coalition, which kept up the pressure for a strong temperature goal and regular its further consideration of emission-cutting plans.
The French hosts also won kudo from negotiators for using a mixture of informal huddles, or indabas, and traditional shuttle diplomacy to bring the deal home.
The text commits countries to peak greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible, and to seek a balance between human-caused emissions and removals by carbon sinks.
This entails bringing down greenhouse gas emissions to net zero within a few decades, said John Schellnhuber, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, and a climate consultant to the Vatican.
But he added that countries would have to move aggressively, peaking before 2030 and eradicating emissions by 2050 through reforestation and technologies such as carbon capture and storage.
For vulnerable countries, the high ambition of the 1.5 C goal was offset by the weakening of the agreement when it came to dealing with irreparable injury of climate change.
The idea of even discussing loss and injury now or in the future was off limits. The Americans told us it would kill the COP, said Leisha Beardmore, the chief negotiator for the Seychelles. They have always been telling us: Dont even say that.
Even so, campaign groups were broadly positive about the outcome. Given intense pressure from oil-producing countries, negotiators managed to craft a text that was much more ambitious than expected.
The universal nature of the agreement was a radical departure from the Kyoto Protocol, the 1997 agreement that depicted sharp divisions between the obligations of wealthy and developing countries but ultimately failed to lower emissions.
Unlike Kyoto, the agreement reached on Saturday depends on political will, with countries setting their own climate action plans.
Rich countries promised that by 2025 they would set a new goal for climate finance from a floor of $100 bn per year, the above figures first pledged at the Copenhagen climate talks six years ago. However, the commitment was offered as a non-binding decision that accompanied the binding text.
All the countries agreed on demands from the US and European Union for five-year its further consideration of their emissions reductions an exercise that had been resisted by China.
Read more: www.theguardian.com