Legislators realize what some voters do not: in many places in the US, voters dont choose legislators legislators opt voters
Public opinion polls in Alabama, Georgia, Ohio and elsewhere have all found that a majority of citizens in those places prefer to keep abortion legal. Yet Republican-controlled legislatures in each of those states have, in the past three months, passed laws that would outlaw abortion in most cases.
The customary reward in a republic for break the will of voters is ejection from office. But the legislators in question do not seem especially worried about a comeuppance in the 2020 election, judging by the extremist quality of their legislating.
The legislators realize what a lot of voters still do not: in many places in the US today, the voters don’t only opt the politicians. The politicians prefer the voters.
Thanks to gerrymandering, by which political insiders describe distorted legislative districts to ensure that one party will hold that district, the only elections many seated officials have to worry about are primary challenges from adversaries most extreme than the issue is, creating a kind of ideological limbs race that is producing increasingly distorted policy, analysts say.
” There is a direct line between gerrymandering and extreme policy outcomes like these ‘heartbeat’ abortion bills ,” said David Daley, the bestselling author of Ratf ** ked: Why Your Vote Doesn’t Count.” And not only does gerrymandering create the circumstances that elect such extreme parliaments, but it constructs it extraordinarily difficult for voters to get rid of them when they go too far.
” This is how gerrymandering defines up minority rule that voters can’t undo at the ballot box. It’s very dangerous, and we need to be taking this very, very seriously .”
As powerfully demonstrated by the passage last month in Alabama by 25 white Republican humen of the country’s strictest abortion statute, minority rule persists as a defining feature of American governance. Bulwarks of minority regulation scope from historical factors such as the disenfranchisement of women and non-white people in the US constitution and the enslavement of African Americans, to today’s dark money in politics and voter suppression schemes.
One of the most effective tools, however, for asserting the kind of minority rule on display in the recent flurry of anti-abortion measures- Republican-controlled legislatures in at least six nations have passed strict new anti-abortion laws in the past three months- is gerrymandering, analysts say.
The parties’ strategies for gerrymandering, which as Daley’s volume explains has been astonishingly effective on the Republican side over the last 15 years, may be about to be rewritten, if the supreme court rules as expected this month on whether the court should even hear partisan gerrymandering occurrences( as distinct from gerrymandering based, for example, on race ).
Read more: www.theguardian.com